Watch the law with whistleblowers, recruiters are warned

While recruiters are within their rights to refuse to engage serial whistleblowers, firing them once they are engaged is fraught with risk.

The warning follows a case involving mental health nurse Noel Finn, who was found by a Bury St Edmunds tribunal to have been unfairly dismissed by mental healthcare provider St Andrew’s Healthcare, which feared he was seeking to highlight its failures in his new role.

Finn had previously helped expose separate scandals at an immigration detention centre and on a government assessment programme, as well as going undercover for a Channel 4 documentary.

Melanie Stancliffe, partner at Cripps Pemberton Greenish, explains a whistleblower is protected forever for having disclosed the wrongdoing: “Employers would need to avoid refusing their candidacy or appointment because the person raised the issue.

“The troublemaker perception is largely old hat these days – most businesses perceive this is an employee of integrity who was willing to stand up for what is right and will not tolerate cheats in their business they work for. So good news.”

Commenting on the implications for recruiters, Stephen Jennings, partner solicitor at Tozers Solicitors, told Recruiter at the moment, whistleblowing protection covers workers but not job applicants – other than certain NHS job applicants. 

“An agency could therefore refuse to engage an applicant but once the applicant has been engaged then it would be dangerous to take action against a whistleblower, as this employer found to its cost. Employers should be very careful about whistleblowers; dismissals due to whistleblowing are automatically unfair. The wider point, of course, is that, however challenging it may be to deal with an employee who is fault-finding, whistleblowing is in the public interest and ultimately potentially in the employer’s interest as well; shooting the messenger is rarely the best strategy.”

But Sybille Steiner, partner at law firm Irwin Mitchell, adds while there is limited protection for former whistleblowers during the recruitment process, refusing to engage an employee or worker on the basis that they have previously blown the whistle may in itself create negative publicity for the employer. 

“Whistleblowing laws are currently under review and the All Party Parliamentary Group’s report has identified some recommendations in respect of changing whistleblowing legislation. While the report does not currently recommend changes in respect of increasing protection for whistleblowing during the recruitment process, it may be highlighted if it becomes an increased concern for whistleblowers.”

• Comment below on this story. You can also tweet us to tell us your thoughts or share this story with a friend. Our editorial email is [email protected]

PM Starmer unveils White Paper to reform immigration system

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer today unveiled the government’s Immigration white paper “to reduce migration” and strengthen the UK’s borders.

Legislation 12 May 2025

APSCo briefs House of Lords on more amendments to Employment Rights Bill

Trade body APSCo has warned Peers of urgent amendments needed to the Employment Rights Bill, which must be addressed before it reaches Royal Assent.

Legislation 30 April 2025

Businesses need to be patient for OPW rules to change

Small businesses will need to wait a few more years before being relinquished of their off-payroll working obligations.

Legislation 14 April 2025

Californian master plan calls for new statewide collaborative to align education, training and hiring needs

In the US, the state of California is proposing to launch digital career passports for the labour market.

Legislation 14 April 2025
Top