[Skip to content]

Recruiter
TwitterYoutubelinkedInTumblr
Search our Site
Thursday 20 June 2013
CURRENT ISSUE
To read the latest issue, click here
Recruiter cover
To view past issues, click here

Subscribe
SPECIAL REPORTS
June 2013 supplement
Hot 100
Asia Pacific
Fast 50
Australia
.

ASA judgement for U4jobs

Wed, 25 April 2012
Jobs listing site u4jobs.co.uk has been ordered not to run an advert for its services again following an adjudication from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

The ad, which ran in February of this year, featured various brand logos alongside the text ‘Partners & Employers’, with a complainant challenging “whether the use of the company logos was misleading, because he understood those organisations were neither partners nor employers”, according to the ASA.
U4jobs did not respond to the ASA’s enquiries and the complaint was upheld, with the ASA reporting that it was “concerned by U4jobs’ lack of response and apparent disregard for the [Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP)] Code”.

The ASA also “reminded U4jobs of their responsibility to respond promptly to our enquiries and told them to do so in the future”, and concluded that the ad was misleading, because the company “did not send evidence to show that the logos belonged to genuine business partners and they had permission to use the logos”.
Page Comments
Please enter your comments below
Fill out the all the boxes and click the 'Submit' button to make a comment on this page
*Comments are added to the bottom of the page. They are moderated and will not be published until approved by the Recruiter team. They may be edited.
Re the article headline

"ASA judgement for U4jobs".

Bearing in mind the content of the article and the ASA finding the U4jobs advertisement misleading, in order to not be misleading itself, should the headline not have read

"ASA judgement against U4jobs" ?

Tom Atkinson (25/04/2012 16:48:06)