Thursday, 09 February 2012

Ditch the 'first past the post' culture

Relationships matter, both with clients and candidates - and form the basis of an ethical way of working

A few years ago a recruiter from a major agency told me that his targets included sending out 70 CVs a day. This was only possible by indiscriminately emailing CVs regardless of clients’ or candidates’ wishes. He added the unforgettable line: “If somebody is looking to change job, what does it matter if their CV lands on their boss’s desk”!

’First past the post’ culture encourages this appalling practice. Not only is it in flagrant disregard of various requirements of employment agency legislation, it also does nothing to enhance the reputation of the recruitment industry or foster good inter-agency working relationships. ’First past the post’ results in embarrassment by all parties, frustration, disappointment and anger, and lost fees by the agency that actually deserves them.

So what is the answer? Simply that the ’first past the post’ culture must be replaced with recognition of the agency that did the work.

In a recent article in Recruiter, Bob Wicks effectively besmirched relationship building with the astonishing statement: “My time is very valuable and, being so valuable, I would not want to waste it for any reason or candidate”. Over the past 15 years we at James Rushmore have been very guilty of ’wasting’ immense amounts of our ’valuable’ time with candidates and clients. Whether or not there is immediate business to transact, we have always taken a long-term view and spent time developing relationships on both sides of the fence. Thankfully I know we are not the only agency to work this way. This methodology is work-intensive and time-consuming, some might say time-wasting, however it ultimately means we send out a much smaller number of CVs and ’waste’ our own time rather than our clients’.

It is a practice that works, though that said this is often at the cost of a significant amount of genuinely wasted time and frustration. I’m sure every ethical agency is familiar with the scenario. An email arrives from a client in response to a CV you’ve just sent. You open it expectantly, only to find it reads: “Sorry, we’ve already had this candidate from another agency”. You check with the candidate, and inevitably find that you are the only one who’s discussed the vacancy with them. Some desperate and unethical agency has fired in your candidate’s CV without their agreement, flying in the face of current legislation, ethical standards, business morality, and probably also the Data Protection Act.

I have to ask the question, why do we do our job? For pressure, stress, and to see who can rush a CV first to a client to make a quick buck? Or to do a good, quality job? Are we there for ourselves or for those we purport to be helping build their staff or develop their careers? Sadly the recruitment industry is generally far too concerned with the former, whatever legislation is in place. But then do you know a recruiter who has got rich by doing a caring, quality job?

So here’s a novel solution - build good relationships with your clients. Spend time with them, even if no business is immediately available. Get to know them at a personal level, don’t always talk business.

So here’s a novel solution – build good relationships with your clients. Spend time with them, even if no business is immediately available. Get to know them at a personal level, don’t always talk business. Make sure they know how you work.Check with every candidate whether they already know about your client and their vacancy; have they been given the client’s name in accordance with legislation? And in your covering email with the CV always note that you have the express agreement of the candidate to forward their CV and that no other agency has been so approved.

Does this work? Not every time, but it is one little step in dismantling ’first past the post’, replacing it with ethical trading standards, enhancing the reputation of our valuable industry, and bringing a little more satisfaction to your day.

And the ’rule breakers’? The CV spammers? Boil them in tar and condemn them to selling double glazing for the rest of their days.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Very good article indeed, and a subject very close to my heart. It's ironic that whenever PSLs are created or renewed, agency ethics and practices are always high on the agenda (and rightly so); however when you study the t&c's the CV acceptance criteria is always 'first past the post'. At NES, we recently won PSL status with a major food manufacturing client and, in response to this requirement, requested that this clause be changed in the case where it is challenged, and the candidate be given the opportunity to contact the client to confirm which agency they wish to be represented by. Our client agreed to this amendment, and it is something that we will look to push going forward.

    Lee Knowles
    Director
    NES UK

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well what can I say, except that I whole heartedly agree with every word! The amount of times that we 'lose out' on candidates because of these types of practices is nothing short of scandalous. We go to great lengths to discuss every vacancy with our candidates and we also always reassure them that we never send their CV anywhere without obtaining their specific approval first. I suppose that it is not surprising that it is often some of the best and most appropriate candidates that do get sent to clients without their permission, because to 'waste the time' by speaking to them could mean that they too miss out as an equally unscrupulous competitor will no doubt just send the CV anyway. I believe that the answer lies with clients to insist, for example, that all candidates have been interviewed face to face before their CV is sent over and anyone found guilty of not doing so will be removed from the client's PSL. My favourite story is of a candidate that we contacted, who responded somewhat aggressively and when I asked why he revealed that his CV had been sent to the Managing Director of an insurance broker that he dealt with by 10 different agencies, of which 8 he had never heard of or had any contact with and the other 2 had not spoken to him about the company concerned!

    Chris Croucher
    Managing Director
    AMC Insurance Appointments Ltd

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have come to this article and subesequent comments rather belatedly but feel that this is a point worth making: if a customer subscribes to the 'first come, first served' model of recruitment, and is resistant to change, just don't work with them!

    There are clients out there who do want to build relationships with a small number of agencies they can rely upon to behave ethically, adhere to best practice and deliver results - these things aren't mutually exclusive - but it is much easier to achieve this holy trinity (and subsequently recruitment nirvana :-)) when your clients share your values.

    Jayne Hannon
    Senior Consultant/Director
    Hi-Tech Selection

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory